XEMD vs. VOLT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOLT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tema. XEMD is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, XEMD returned 8.88% vs 36.60% for VOLT. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XEMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

XEMD vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 28.30% return.

XEMD

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: 1.43%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 1Y: 8.88%
• 3Y*: 10.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.24%

VOLT

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -8.10%
• 6M: 15.18%
• YTD: 28.30%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	$11.21M	$11.77M	$15.67M
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	$5.44M	$11.46M	$8.01M

XEMD vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	2.49%	13.98%	-0.85%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	28.30%	25.92%	-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and VOLT is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

XEMD vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XEMD

XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 81
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 82

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 63
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XEMD vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XEMD	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.50	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.04	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.14	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.95	8.15	+2.80

XEMD vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEMD	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.01%	-23.40%	+13.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.52%	-17.22%	+13.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-11.75%	+10.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-5.34%	+4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	4.50%	-3.69%

Volatility

XEMD vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 0.96%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEMD	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	9.95%	-8.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.80%	21.11%	-17.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.74%	24.43%	-19.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.80%	25.46%	-18.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.80%	25.46%	-18.66%

XEMD vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEMD vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than VOLT's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.36%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	5.82%	6.15%	6.30%	6.19%	3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEMD and VOLT in my portfolio?

XEMD and VOLT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XEMD or VOLT?

VOLT has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

Which ETF is better, XEMD or VOLT?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 36.60% vs 8.88% for XEMD. On fees, XEMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XEMD has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XEMD or VOLT?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 36.60% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEMD or VOLT?

XEMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XEMD or VOLT?

XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.36% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between XEMD and VOLT?

XEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while VOLT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XEMD and 0.75% for VOLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.