XEMD vs. VEVRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) and VEVRX (Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6) are both funds - XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VEVRX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Victory. XEMD is passively managed, while VEVRX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEMD returned 11.00%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for VEVRX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for VEVRX.

Performance

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than VEVRX's 11.82% return.

XEMD

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 3.04%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 11.70%
• 3Y*: 11.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEVRX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: 10.67%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: 11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	3.04%	13.98%	8.77%	10.26%	2.40%
VEVRX Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6	11.82%	2.66%	10.18%	10.46%	8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and VEVRX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022	0.49

Return for Risk

XEMD vs. VEVRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD

XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 80
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

VEVRX

VEVRX Risk / Return Rank: 32
VEVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
VEVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
VEVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
VEVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
VEVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XEMD	VEVRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.41	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.15	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.25	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.35	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	7.35	+7.57

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the VEVRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and VEVRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum VEVRX drawdown of -41.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and VEVRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEMD	VEVRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.01%	-41.00%	+30.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.52%	-7.49%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.31%	-20.25%	+15.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-1.42%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-5.05%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	2.39%	-1.60%

Volatility

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 1.48%, while Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEVRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEMD	VEVRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	3.44%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.87%	8.90%	-5.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.80%	12.48%	-7.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	17.03%	-10.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.88%	19.22%	-12.34%

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VEVRX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEMD vs. VEVRX - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than VEVRX's 4.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VEVRX Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6	4.64%	4.81%	11.61%	6.20%	8.30%	8.42%	5.50%	6.12%	10.72%	3.36%	1.53%	11.57%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	5.81%	6.15%	6.30%	6.19%	3.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEMD and VEVRX in my portfolio?

XEMD and VEVRX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XEMD or VEVRX?

VEVRX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to XEMD (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs VEVRX's -41.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.