XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO
XEF.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF) and XUU.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEF.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index (CAD), while XUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEF.TO returned 9.77%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for XUU.TO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEF.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for XUU.TO.
Performance
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEF.TO achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than XUU.TO's 12.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XEF.TO has underperformed XUU.TO with an annualized return of 9.77%, while XUU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
XEF.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
XUU.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.81%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 9.95% | 25.69% | 12.04% | 15.21% | -9.53% | 10.36% | 6.13% | 15.86% | -6.65% | 18.19% |
XUU.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 12.48% | 11.25% | 34.07% | 23.11% | -13.53% | 25.93% | 16.25% | 23.77% | 2.42% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEF.TO and XUU.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XEF.TO and XUU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Industrials
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Technology
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Healthcare
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Basic Materials
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Consumer Defensive
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Communication Services
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Energy
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Utilities
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Real Estate
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XEF.TO
XUU.TO
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEF.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.32 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 12.64 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEF.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.42 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.94 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.86 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, roughly equal to the maximum XUU.TO drawdown of -28.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF.TO and XUU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEF.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -28.22% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -8.80% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -19.70% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -23.41% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.51% | -28.22% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.29% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -4.09% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.30% | +0.52% |
Volatility
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) at 3.29%. This indicates that XEF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEF.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.29% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 9.08% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 12.06% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 15.45% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 16.59% | -1.74% |
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEF.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XEF.TO vs. XUU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than XUU.TO's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.76% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 2.72% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.42% | 2.42% |
XUU.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.33% | 1.68% | 1.73% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEF.TO and XUU.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for XEF.TO.
XEF.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XUU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. XEF.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index (CAD), while XUU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XEF.TO and 0.07% for XUU.TO.
Find the right allocation for XEF.TO and XUU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer