PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEF.TO achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than HXT.TO's 11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XEF.TO has underperformed HXT.TO with an annualized return of 9.90%, while HXT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.


XEF.TO

1D
0.82%
1M
2.14%
YTD
10.86%
6M
12.33%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
9.90%

HXT.TO

1D
1.27%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.43%
6M
12.87%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
10.86%25.69%12.04%15.21%-9.53%10.36%6.13%15.86%-6.65%18.19%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
11.43%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XEF.TO and HXT.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013

0.62

The correlation between XEF.TO and HXT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEF.TO
HXT.TO

Financial Services

22.9%
37.3%

Industrials

20.5%
8.9%

Technology

10.2%
12.0%

Healthcare

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
3.9%

Basic Materials

6.6%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
3.6%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.4%

Energy

4.0%
15.9%

Utilities

3.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

3.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

XEF.TO
22.9%
HXT.TO
37.3%

Industrials

XEF.TO
20.5%
HXT.TO
8.9%

Technology

XEF.TO
10.2%
HXT.TO
12.0%

Healthcare

XEF.TO
9.8%
HXT.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XEF.TO
8.2%
HXT.TO
3.9%

Basic Materials

XEF.TO
6.6%
HXT.TO
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

XEF.TO
6.4%
HXT.TO
3.6%

Communication Services

XEF.TO
4.4%
HXT.TO
2.4%

Energy

XEF.TO
4.0%
HXT.TO
15.9%

Utilities

XEF.TO
3.8%
HXT.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

XEF.TO
3.1%
HXT.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEF.TO
XEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEF.TOHXT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

4.40

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

20.45

-11.97

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEF.TO and HXT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEF.TOHXT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.88

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

1.16

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.70

+0.01

Drawdowns

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF.TO and HXT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEF.TOHXT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.51%

-35.48%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-7.71%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-12.36%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-16.33%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.51%

-35.48%

+6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-4.66%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.65%

+1.17%

Volatility

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) at 3.40%. This indicates that XEF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEF.TOHXT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

3.40%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

9.40%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

11.77%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

12.77%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

15.17%

-0.32%

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEF.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEF.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
2.19%2.43%2.76%2.75%2.93%2.42%1.93%2.72%2.76%2.10%2.42%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEF.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for XEF.TO.

XEF.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. XEF.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index (CAD), while HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XEF.TO and 0.07% for HXT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEF.TO and HXT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer