XEB.TO vs. URA
XEB.TO (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEB.TO is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Hedged in CAD Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEB.TO returned 1.44%/yr vs 17.62%/yr for URA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEB.TO charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
XEB.TO vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEB.TO is traded in CAD, while URA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEB.TO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 19.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XEB.TO has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 1.44%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.62% annualized return.
XEB.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 8.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
URA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 61.96%
- 3Y*
- 40.07%
- 5Y*
- 24.83%
- 10Y*
- 17.62%
XEB.TO vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEB.TO iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.81% | 11.14% | 3.46% | 8.58% | -19.80% | -3.14% | 2.97% | 13.37% | -7.43% | 8.80% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 19.29% | 59.51% | 7.96% | 43.02% | -5.00% | 56.15% | 38.94% | -8.28% | -15.50% | 11.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEB.TO and URA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEB.TO vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
XEB.TO
URA
XEB.TO vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEB.TO) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEB.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.21 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 4.70 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEB.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.61 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.50 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.01 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XEB.TO vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -90.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEB.TO and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEB.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.53% | -90.50% | +60.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -28.13% | +23.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.26% | -35.85% | +27.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.47% | -35.85% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -57.17% | +27.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -19.66% | +17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -69.54% | +63.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 13.21% | -11.94% |
Volatility
XEB.TO vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEB.TO) is 2.47%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 15.66%. This indicates that XEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEB.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 15.66% | -13.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 37.30% | -32.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.17% | 48.99% | -42.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 41.18% | -31.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.21% | 35.38% | -25.17% |
XEB.TO vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEB.TO has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEB.TO vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
XEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than URA's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
XEB.TO iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.97% | 4.98% | 4.68% | 4.00% | 4.26% | 3.23% | 3.45% | 3.65% | 4.95% | 3.81% | 4.31% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEB.TO and URA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEB.TO is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
XEB.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. XEB.TO tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Hedged in CAD Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for XEB.TO and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for XEB.TO and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer