XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO).

XEB.TO and XLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEB.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Hedged in CAD Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011. XLB.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Nov 6, 2006. Both XEB.TO and XLB.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XEB.TO iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	-2.55%	11.14%	3.46%	8.58%	-19.80%	-3.14%	2.97%	13.37%	-7.43%	8.80%
XLB.TO iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF	-0.63%	-0.76%	9.49%	19.21%	-14.38%	1.26%	16.52%	12.85%	-0.25%	7.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEB.TO achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than XLB.TO's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XEB.TO has underperformed XLB.TO with an annualized return of 1.35%, while XLB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 4.60% annualized return.

XEB.TO

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -4.01%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -0.53%
• 1Y: 5.99%
• 3Y*: 5.89%
• 5Y*: -0.08%
• 10Y*: 1.35%

XLB.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 6M: -1.52%
• 1Y: -3.90%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEB.TO has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

XEB.TO

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

XLB.TO

iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEB.TO

XEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 47
XEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
XEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
XEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
XEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

XLB.TO

XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEB.TO	XLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	-0.44	+1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	-0.53	+1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.93	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	-0.44	+1.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	-0.85	+6.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEB.TO and XLB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEB.TO	XLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	-0.44	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.33	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.39	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.54	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between XEB.TO and XLB.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than XLB.TO's 4.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XEB.TO iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	5.12%	4.98%	4.68%	4.00%	4.26%	3.23%	3.45%	3.65%	4.95%	3.81%	4.31%	4.60%
XLB.TO iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF	4.12%	4.05%	12.10%	12.22%	13.13%	8.82%	7.43%	3.18%	3.56%	3.45%	3.62%	3.64%

Drawdowns

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, which is greater than XLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEB.TO and XLB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEB.TO	XLB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.53%	-24.34%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.94%	-6.92%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.47%	-24.34%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.53%	-24.34%	-5.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.48%	-5.41%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-4.05%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	3.65%	-2.49%

Volatility

XEB.TO vs. XLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEB.TO	XLB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	3.11%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.07%	5.30%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.79%	8.94%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.47%	12.66%	-3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.19%	11.83%	-1.64%