XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L
XDWT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) and EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWT.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom Index, while EMIM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.DE returned 23.65%/yr vs 10.21%/yr for EMIM.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWT.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMIM.L.
Performance
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWT.DE is traded in EUR, while EMIM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMIM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWT.DE achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 24.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.DE has outperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 23.65%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.
XDWT.DE
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 43.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.02%
- 10Y*
- 23.65%
EMIM.L
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 24.15%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 44.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 20.35% | 9.56% | 41.11% | 50.00% | -28.10% | 41.76% | 30.98% | 51.77% | 0.75% | 21.05% |
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.15% | 16.91% | 14.45% | 7.15% | -14.80% | 7.30% | 8.67% | 19.86% | -10.44% | 19.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWT.DE and EMIM.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XDWT.DE and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWT.DE
EMIM.L
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDWT.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 4.00 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 13.91 | -6.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWT.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.DE and EMIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWT.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -34.80% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -10.65% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -17.95% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.46% | -22.35% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -32.44% | +0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -3.48% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -9.29% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 3.07% | +2.95% |
Volatility
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 7.32%. This indicates that XDWT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWT.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 7.32% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 15.25% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.98% | 18.05% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 16.47% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 18.19% | +3.99% |
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWT.DE vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWT.DE nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWT.DE and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
XDWT.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EMIM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom Index, while EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.DE and 0.18% for EMIM.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWT.DE and EMIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer