XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L).
XDWT.DE and XNAQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWT.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both XDWT.DE and XNAQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | -7.07% | 9.56% | 41.11% | 50.00% | -28.10% | 37.46% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | -3.80% | 5.88% | 34.82% | 50.96% | -29.29% | 32.78% |
Different Trading Currencies
XDWT.DE is traded in EUR, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWT.DE achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than XNAQ.L's -3.80% return.
XDWT.DE
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -5.37%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.38%
- 10Y*
- 20.36%
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWT.DE
XNAQ.L
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWT.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.80 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 4.54 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWT.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.80 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.69 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWT.DE and XNAQ.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWT.DE nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWT.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAQ.L drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.DE and XNAQ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWT.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.61% | -27.52% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -11.05% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.46% | -27.52% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -8.18% | -4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -7.19% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 3.68% | +2.05% |
Volatility
XDWT.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) at 5.27%. This indicates that XDWT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XDWT.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 5.27% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 11.91% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.69% | 20.35% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 19.78% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 19.88% | +1.49% |