EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L).
EMIM.L and VDPG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. VDPG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both EMIM.L and VDPG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMIM.L or VDPG.L.
Key characteristics
| EMIM.L | VDPG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.28% | 1.87% |
| 1Y Return | 14.16% | 7.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.28% | 0.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.10 | 0.54 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.81% | 14.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.70% | -30.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.62% | -2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIM.L and VDPG.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than VDPG.L's 1.87% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMIM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMIM.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than VDPG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and VDPG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMIM.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) is 4.11%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that EMIM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.