EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L).
EMIM.L and XMMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. XMMS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 21, 2017. Both EMIM.L and XMMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.14% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | 0.74% | 14.91% | 12.69% | -8.03% |
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 3.16% | 24.71% | 9.13% | 2.81% | -10.67% | -1.61% | 13.55% | 14.48% | -8.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than XMMS.L's 3.16% return.
EMIM.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
XMMS.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMIM.L and XMMS.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMIM.L
XMMS.L
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMIM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 1.70 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.19 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.42 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.92 | 7.89 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMIM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.70 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.28 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.30 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIM.L and XMMS.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMIM.L nor XMMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than XMMS.L's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and XMMS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -27.76% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -11.06% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -24.32% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -10.56% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -10.19% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.39% | -0.11% |
Volatility
EMIM.L vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) have volatilities of 7.92% and 7.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMIM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 7.77% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 12.23% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 16.46% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 16.12% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 18.67% | -1.05% |