XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L
XDWS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.L returned 5.57%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWS.L achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's 3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 5.57%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
XDWS.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 3.29% | 9.31% | 5.69% | 1.96% | -5.24% | 12.84% | 7.75% | 22.32% | -10.10% | 17.07% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.70% | 64.92% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.28% | -1.31% | 11.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWS.L and IGLN.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWS.L
IGLN.L
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.25 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.86 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 4.79 | -4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 1.30 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 1.07 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.86 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.46 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.L and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -45.24% | +21.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -17.36% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.52% | -17.36% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.53% | -21.15% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.72% | -21.15% | -2.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.95% | -15.66% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -19.80% | +15.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 6.74% | -2.36% |
Volatility
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) is 4.62%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that XDWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWS.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 6.36% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 21.73% | -11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 24.78% | -12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 17.36% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 15.54% | -3.06% |
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWS.L and IGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWS.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWS.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWS.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWS.L and IGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. XDWS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XDWS.L and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer