XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (ICSU.L).
XDWS.L and ICSU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. ICSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. Both XDWS.L and ICSU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWS.L or ICSU.L.
Key characteristics
| XDWS.L | ICSU.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.58% | 15.77% |
| 1Y Return | 15.33% | 14.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.23% | 10.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.56% | 8.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.71 | 1.35 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.11% | 10.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.72% | -18.54% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWS.L and ICSU.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDWS.L achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than ICSU.L's 15.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWS.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.L and ICSU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWS.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) is 2.25%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that XDWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.