XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE
XDWM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWM.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWM.DE returned 7.86%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWM.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWM.DE achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
XDWM.DE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 20.60%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 31.13%
- 1Y
- 51.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 15.62% | 12.88% | 0.02% | 10.77% | -4.99% | 26.01% | 9.43% | 25.66% | -13.34% | 10.95% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWM.DE and XMME.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XDWM.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWM.DE
XMME.DE
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.55 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 4.98 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 18.04 | -9.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 3.00 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.51 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.45 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWM.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -31.96% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -10.67% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -19.16% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -24.38% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -1.04% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -9.53% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.95% | +0.39% |
Volatility
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) is 6.55%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XDWM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 7.48% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 14.90% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 17.70% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 16.74% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 18.61% | -1.03% |
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWM.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWM.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWM.DE.
XDWM.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XDWM.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWM.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWM.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer