PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C
11.13%12.88%0.02%10.77%-4.99%26.01%9.43%25.66%-13.34%13.08%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
-0.17%6.65%39.28%8.13%-12.80%23.13%17.40%31.22%1.02%15.65%
Different Trading Currencies

XDWM.DE is traded in EUR, while XDEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWM.DE achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than XDEM.L's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWM.DE has underperformed XDEM.L with an annualized return of 11.13%, while XDEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


XDWM.DE

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
11.13%
6M
18.57%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.13%

XDEM.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
1.15%
1Y
11.27%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWM.DE and XDEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWM.DE
XDWM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWM.DEXDEM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

0.58

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

0.94

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.00

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.28

7.77

+2.51

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWM.DE and XDEM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWM.DEXDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.58

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.76

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between XDWM.DE and XDEM.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWM.DE nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWM.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than XDEM.L's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.DE and XDEM.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWM.DEXDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-22.42%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-9.01%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-20.13%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.91%

-22.42%

-11.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-4.61%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-5.05%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.30%

+0.62%

Volatility

XDWM.DE vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) at 7.64%. This indicates that XDWM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDWM.DEXDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

7.64%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

13.13%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

19.23%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

17.04%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

17.17%

+0.35%