XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE
XDWM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C) and DXSC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds from Xtrackers - XDWM.DE tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while DXSC.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWM.DE returned 10.97%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for DXSC.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWM.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DXSC.DE.
Performance
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWM.DE achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than DXSC.DE's 9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWM.DE has underperformed DXSC.DE with an annualized return of 10.97%, while DXSC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.
XDWM.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
DXSC.DE
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 16.32% | 12.88% | 0.02% | 10.77% | -4.99% | 26.01% | 9.43% | 25.66% | -13.34% | 13.08% |
DXSC.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 9.21% | 8.23% | -1.25% | 18.77% | -13.04% | 26.49% | 13.22% | 22.28% | -12.90% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWM.DE and DXSC.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XDWM.DE and DXSC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWM.DE
DXSC.DE
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWM.DE | DXSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 0.69 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 2.15 | +7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWM.DE | DXSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.58 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.23 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.07 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWM.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum DXSC.DE drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.DE and DXSC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWM.DE | DXSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -73.82% | +39.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -14.34% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -17.53% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -25.63% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.91% | -44.96% | +11.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -1.36% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -30.18% | +24.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 4.61% | -1.27% |
Volatility
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) have volatilities of 7.02% and 6.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWM.DE | DXSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 6.85% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.24% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 16.92% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 17.99% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 23.79% | -6.21% |
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DXSC.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWM.DE nor DXSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWM.DE and DXSC.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWM.DE.
XDWM.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while DXSC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWM.DE and 0.17% for DXSC.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWM.DE and DXSC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer