PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWI.DE achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than XDWM.DE's 15.62% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.DE has outperformed XDWM.DE with an annualized return of 12.07%, while XDWM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.


XDWI.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.18%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.38%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
12.07%

XDWM.DE

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.06%
YTD
15.62%
6M
20.60%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWI.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
12.20%12.06%19.50%19.04%-7.86%26.23%1.52%31.50%-11.18%10.04%
XDWM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C
15.62%12.88%0.02%10.77%-4.99%26.01%9.43%25.66%-13.34%13.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.79

The correlation between XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWI.DE
XDWI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XDWI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWM.DE
XDWM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWI.DEXDWM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.17

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

8.91

-1.40

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWI.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.70

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.46

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Drawdowns

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWI.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, which is greater than XDWM.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWI.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.10%

-33.91%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-13.67%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.09%

-20.77%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.09%

-20.77%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.10%

-33.91%

-4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-2.14%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-5.48%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.34%

-0.74%

Volatility

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) is 3.96%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that XDWI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWI.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

6.55%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

15.21%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

17.45%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.31%

16.81%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.58%

-0.80%

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWI.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWI.DE nor XDWM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWI.DE and XDWM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer