XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L).
XDWI.DE and IWQU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWI.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. IWQU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. Both XDWI.DE and IWQU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWI.DE or IWQU.L.
Key characteristics
| XDWI.DE | IWQU.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.70% | 17.32% |
| 1Y Return | 21.77% | 28.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.64% | 7.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.74% | 12.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.00 | 2.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.01% | 12.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.10% | -33.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.60% | -1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.DE and IWQU.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.DE achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than IWQU.L's 17.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IWQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.DE nor IWQU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, which is greater than IWQU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.DE and IWQU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWI.DE vs. IWQU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.