XDWH.L vs. PPH
XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and PPH (VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XDWH.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while PPH tracks the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.L returned 7.85%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for PPH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWH.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PPH.
Performance
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.L achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 2.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWH.L having a 7.85% annualized return and PPH not far behind at 7.78%.
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
PPH
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.63% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.L and PPH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XDWH.L and PPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWH.L
PPH
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XDWH.L
PPH
Consumer Defensive
XDWH.L
PPH
-
Basic Materials
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Communication Services
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Energy
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Financial Services
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Industrials
XDWH.L
-
PPH
Real Estate
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Technology
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Utilities
XDWH.L
-
PPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.L vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.L
PPH
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.00 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 4.65 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.22 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.66 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.46 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.31 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.L and PPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.24% | -51.45% | +25.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -10.76% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -18.06% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.28% | -20.26% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.24% | -29.70% | +3.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -5.21% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -17.31% | +12.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 4.62% | -0.50% |
Volatility
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) is 4.80%, while VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that XDWH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.L | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 5.81% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 12.12% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 17.57% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 15.14% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 16.99% | -2.02% |
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWH.L vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.05% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.L and PPH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PPH.
XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.L and 0.36% for PPH.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.L and PPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer