PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWH.L vs. PPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWH.L achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 2.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWH.L having a 7.85% annualized return and PPH not far behind at 7.78%.


XDWH.L

1D
2.99%
1M
3.25%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.85%

PPH

1D
3.42%
1M
2.35%
YTD
2.63%
6M
6.36%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
7.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-2.74%15.25%0.75%3.81%-5.42%20.56%12.88%22.95%1.57%20.16%
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.63%22.00%8.05%6.95%2.64%17.79%5.49%19.39%-5.89%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWH.L and PPH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016

0.58

The correlation between XDWH.L and PPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWH.L
PPH

Healthcare

98.9%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XDWH.L
98.9%
PPH
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

XDWH.L
0.5%
PPH

-

Basic Materials

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Communication Services

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Energy

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Financial Services

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Industrials

XDWH.L

-

PPH
0.1%

Real Estate

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Technology

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Utilities

XDWH.L

-

PPH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWH.L vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWH.L
XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWH.LPPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.00

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

4.65

-1.85

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the PPH Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWH.L and PPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWH.LPPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.22

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.66

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.46

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.31

+0.26

Drawdowns

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWH.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.L and PPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWH.LPPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.24%

-51.45%

+25.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-10.76%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-18.06%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-20.26%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.24%

-29.70%

+3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-5.21%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-17.31%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

4.62%

-0.50%

Volatility

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) is 4.80%, while VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that XDWH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWH.LPPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.81%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

12.12%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

17.57%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

15.14%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

16.99%

-2.02%

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWH.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWH.L vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison

XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.05%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWH.L and PPH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PPH.

XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.L and 0.36% for PPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWH.L and PPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer