XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XSVT.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XSVT.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDWH.DE returned 2.67%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for XSVT.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XSVT.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than XSVT.DE's 21.63% return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XSVT.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 21.63%
- 6M
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 42.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | 9.53% |
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 21.63% | 14.36% | 15.10% | -12.67% | 14.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XSVT.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022 | 0.05 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XSVT.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
XSVT.DE
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.41 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 4.58 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 10.89 | -8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.31 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.61 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum XSVT.DE drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XSVT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -27.57% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -9.35% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -15.97% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -1.81% | -6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -14.41% | +9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.95% | +0.25% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) at 4.33%. This indicates that XDWH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.33% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 15.57% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 18.53% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 18.83% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 18.83% | -4.14% |
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVT.DE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor XSVT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and XSVT.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XSVT.DE.
XDWH.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XSVT.DE is Commodities. XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XSVT.DE tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.29% for XSVT.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and XSVT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer