XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE).
XDWH.DE and XNAS.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. XNAS.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both XDWH.DE and XNAS.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWH.DE or XNAS.DE.
Key characteristics
| XDWH.DE | XNAS.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.76% | 15.53% |
| 1Y Return | 14.37% | 22.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.61 | 1.52 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.19% | 16.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.08% | -26.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.62% | -7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDWH.DE having a 15.76% return and XNAS.DE slightly lower at 15.53%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XNAS.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) is 2.65%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that XDWH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.