XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XESC.DE (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XESC.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE returned 7.61%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for XESC.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XESC.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 7.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has underperformed XESC.DE with an annualized return of 7.61%, while XESC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.49% annualized return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XESC.DE
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 7.20% | 22.24% | 11.06% | 22.50% | -8.87% | 23.54% | -2.88% | 30.09% | -12.09% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XESC.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XESC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
XESC.DE
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.45 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 4.94 | -2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.98 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.32 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XESC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -45.38% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -10.88% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -16.53% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -23.33% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | -38.51% | +12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -0.53% | -7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -8.39% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.19% | +1.01% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.90% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 13.02% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 16.01% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 17.54% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 18.27% | -3.58% |
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XDWH.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and XESC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer