PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWE.L vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWE.L is traded in GBp, while XLE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWE.L has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 12.33%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.81% annualized return.


XDWE.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.78%
YTD
9.58%
6M
9.98%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
12.33%

XLE

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
32.80%
6M
28.44%
1Y
49.42%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
21.76%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
9.58%3.94%14.06%7.78%-1.34%31.37%7.89%23.88%-3.69%7.95%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.80%0.19%7.40%-5.60%83.86%54.73%-34.65%7.49%-13.37%-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWE.L and XLE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between XDWE.L and XLE has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWE.L
XLE

Technology

18.3%

-

Industrials

14.7%

-

Financial Services

14.4%

-

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Utilities

6.1%

-

Energy

4.6%
100.0%

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Technology

XDWE.L
18.3%
XLE

-

Industrials

XDWE.L
14.7%
XLE

-

Financial Services

XDWE.L
14.4%
XLE

-

Healthcare

XDWE.L
10.9%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDWE.L
10.3%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

XDWE.L
6.5%
XLE

-

Real Estate

XDWE.L
6.2%
XLE

-

Utilities

XDWE.L
6.1%
XLE

-

Energy

XDWE.L
4.6%
XLE
100.0%

Basic Materials

XDWE.L
4.1%
XLE

-

Communication Services

XDWE.L
4.0%
XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWE.L vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWE.LXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.62

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

10.37

+1.46

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWE.L and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWE.LXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.28

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.37

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.28

+0.48

Drawdowns

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWE.LXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.08%

-62.74%

+31.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-13.73%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-22.57%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.67%

-22.59%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.08%

-62.74%

+31.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.19%

+7.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-14.61%

+10.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

4.78%

-3.01%

Volatility

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) is 2.03%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that XDWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWE.LXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

8.94%

-6.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

17.50%

-11.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

21.86%

-12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

25.76%

-11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

29.34%

-13.25%

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWE.L vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

XDWE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWE.L and XLE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.

XDWE.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLE is Energy Equities. XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDWE.L and 0.08% for XLE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWE.L and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer