XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L).
XDWE.L and EWSP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWE.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. EWSP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Aug 2, 2022. Both XDWE.L and EWSP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWE.L or EWSP.L.
Key characteristics
| XDWE.L | EWSP.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.27% | 13.31% |
| 1Y Return | 20.61% | 20.61% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.07 | 2.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.89 | 2.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.73 | 1.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.46 | 10.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.05% | 2.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.39% | 10.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.08% | -12.48% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWE.L and EWSP.L is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDWE.L having a 13.27% return and EWSP.L slightly higher at 13.31%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWE.L and EWSP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWE.L nor EWSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, which is greater than EWSP.L's maximum drawdown of -12.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and EWSP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWE.L vs. EWSP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) have volatilities of 2.37% and 2.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.