XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDWC.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C) and XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWC.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XDEQ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWC.L returned 11.05%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for XDEQ.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDWC.L is traded in USD, while XDEQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWC.L achieves a -2.34% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.L's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWC.L has underperformed XDEQ.L with an annualized return of 11.05%, while XDEQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.

XDWC.L

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: -2.34%
• 6M: -1.21%
• 1Y: 8.42%
• 3Y*: 12.88%
• 5Y*: 4.85%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

XDEQ.L

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 8.37%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 21.10%
• 3Y*: 18.26%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 12.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDWC.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C	-2.34%	7.36%	22.22%	35.93%	-33.50%	17.39%	37.11%	25.92%	-6.13%	23.78%
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C	8.37%	15.63%	16.92%	25.51%	-19.12%	23.44%	15.50%	34.70%	-10.09%	22.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWC.L and XDEQ.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016	0.63

The correlation between XDWC.L and XDEQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDWC.L	XDEQ.L
Consumer Cyclical	96.3%	8.9%
Technology	2.9%	30.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	5.3%
Communication Services	0.1%	9.1%
Industrials	0.1%	10.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Energy	-	4.6%
Financial Services	-	14.7%
Healthcare	-	9.2%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWC.L

XDWC.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
XDWC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XDWC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XDWC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XDWC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XDWC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

XDEQ.L

XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDWC.L	XDEQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.92	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	2.91	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.34	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	2.39	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	10.20	-8.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWC.L and XDEQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDWC.L	XDEQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	1.92	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.69	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.98	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.98	-0.41

Drawdowns

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWC.L drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -32.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWC.L and XDEQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWC.L	XDEQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-32.05%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.08%	-8.79%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-16.64%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.26%	-28.33%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.26%	-32.05%	-5.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	0.00%	-5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.31%	-5.29%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	2.06%	+3.28%

Volatility

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that XDWC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDWC.L	XDEQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	2.68%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	8.35%	+5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	10.98%	+6.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	15.32%	+5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	18.28%	+1.40%

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWC.L and XDEQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDWC.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWC.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDWC.L and XDEQ.L in my portfolio?

XDWC.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDWC.L or XDEQ.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDWC.L or XDEQ.L?

XDWC.L and XDEQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between XDWC.L and XDEQ.L?

XDWC.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XDEQ.L is Global Equities. XDWC.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD.