XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L).
XDEQ.L and XDEV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDEQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. XDEV.L is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. Both XDEQ.L and XDEV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDEQ.L or XDEV.L.
Performance
XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 18.50% return, which is significantly higher than XDEV.L's 7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.L has outperformed XDEV.L with an annualized return of 12.80%, while XDEV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.
XDEQ.L
18.50%
0.90%
6.15%
23.61%
12.65%
12.80%
XDEV.L
7.21%
0.11%
0.55%
13.24%
6.79%
8.27%
Key characteristics
| XDEQ.L | XDEV.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 1.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.05 | 1.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.58 | 1.53 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.80 | 5.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.80% | 2.15% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.84% | 10.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.79% | -28.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.24% | -0.31% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDEQ.L and XDEV.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between XDEQ.L and XDEV.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEQ.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and XDEV.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDEQ.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.90%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.