XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L).
XDWC.L and WCOD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. WCOD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both XDWC.L and WCOD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWC.L or WCOD.L.
Key characteristics
| XDWC.L | WCOD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.81% | 3.96% |
| 1Y Return | 20.19% | 20.26% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.67% | 1.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.67% | 10.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.15 | 1.14 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.77% | 16.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.26% | -37.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.27% | -10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWC.L and WCOD.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDWC.L having a 3.81% return and WCOD.L slightly higher at 3.96%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WCOD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWC.L nor WCOD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWC.L drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, roughly equal to the maximum WCOD.L drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWC.L and WCOD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWC.L vs. WCOD.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) have volatilities of 4.97% and 5.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.