XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L).

XDWC.L and XLYP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. XLYP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both XDWC.L and XLYP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDWC.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C	-9.48%	7.36%	22.22%	35.93%	-33.50%	17.39%	37.11%	25.92%	-6.13%	23.78%
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	-7.98%	7.79%	28.49%	39.29%	-34.04%	29.46%	25.89%	29.14%	0.22%	21.88%

Different Trading Currencies

XDWC.L is traded in USD, while XLYP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLYP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWC.L achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLYP.L's -7.98% return.

XDWC.L

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -3.92%
• YTD: -9.48%
• 6M: -8.39%
• 1Y: 8.56%
• 3Y*: 11.66%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: —

XLYP.L

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -4.60%
• YTD: -7.98%
• 6M: -7.79%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 15.86%
• 5Y*: 7.46%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDWC.L

Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C

XLYP.L

Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWC.L

XDWC.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
XDWC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XDWC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XDWC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
XDWC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XDWC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XLYP.L

XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDWC.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.60	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	0.98	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.12	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	0.76	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.71	2.68	-0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWC.L and XLYP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDWC.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	0.60	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.34	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.60	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between XDWC.L and XLYP.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWC.L nor XLYP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWC.L drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XLYP.L drawdown of -37.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWC.L and XLYP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWC.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-30.40%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.08%	-12.73%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.26%	-30.40%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.26%	-30.40%	-6.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.57%	-10.73%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.34%	-6.53%	-1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	4.00%	+0.66%

Volatility

XDWC.L vs. XLYP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) at 6.48%. This indicates that XDWC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLYP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDWC.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	6.48%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	11.78%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	20.62%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	21.66%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	20.52%	-1.01%