PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDUH.TO (iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and CUD.TO (iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from iShares - XDUH.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while CUD.TO tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDUH.TO returned 6.48%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for CUD.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDUH.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for CUD.TO.

Performance

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDUH.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUH.TO achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than CUD.TO's 5.32% return.

XDUH.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.93%
6M
7.07%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
—

CUD.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
5.32%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
5.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDUH.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		8.93%8.02%9.45%5.57%-6.32%22.54%-2.08%21.38%-6.70%
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		5.32%1.72%6.13%0.09%-2.31%18.87%-2.58%21.16%-5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUH.TO and CUD.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018

0.61

The correlation between XDUH.TO and CUD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDUH.TO
CUD.TO

Healthcare

20.6%
7.6%

Technology

15.3%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.5%
16.2%

Industrials

13.1%
17.3%

Energy

11.8%
3.2%

Financial Services

9.2%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.8%

Utilities

3.6%
14.6%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
6.0%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Healthcare

XDUH.TO
20.6%
CUD.TO
7.6%

Technology

XDUH.TO
15.3%
CUD.TO
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

XDUH.TO
14.5%
CUD.TO
16.2%

Industrials

XDUH.TO
13.1%
CUD.TO
17.3%

Energy

XDUH.TO
11.8%
CUD.TO
3.2%

Financial Services

XDUH.TO
9.2%
CUD.TO
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUH.TO
9.1%
CUD.TO
5.8%

Utilities

XDUH.TO
3.6%
CUD.TO
14.6%

Communication Services

XDUH.TO
2.6%
CUD.TO
2.5%

Basic Materials

XDUH.TO
1.1%
CUD.TO
6.0%

Real Estate

XDUH.TO

-

CUD.TO
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XDUH.TO:
XDUH.TO vs. SCHDXDUH.TO vs. XDGH.TOXDUH.TO vs. XDU.TOXDUH.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDUH.TO vs. ZDY.TOXDUH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDUH.TO vs. XDV.TO
Often compared with CUD.TO:
CUD.TO vs. CDZ.TOCUD.TO vs. XHU.TOCUD.TO vs. DGROCUD.TO vs. CYH.TOCUD.TO vs. SCHDCUD.TO vs. ^GSPCCUD.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDUH.TO
XDUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
CUD.TO
CUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDUH.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDUH.TOCUD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.43
0.40

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.11
0.64

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

0.64

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

1.57

+5.30

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUH.TO and CUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDUH.TOCUD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.40

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.12

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.35

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.60

-0.19

Drawdowns

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, smaller than the maximum CUD.TO drawdown of -38.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUH.TO and CUD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDUH.TOCUD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.91%

-38.36%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-7.34%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.37%

-15.28%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-18.06%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.36%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-4.84%

+3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-4.09%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.00%

-0.80%

Volatility

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDUH.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) at 2.69%. This indicates that XDUH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDUH.TOCUD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.69%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.50%

8.82%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

11.74%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

14.67%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

17.20%

-0.65%

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUH.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than CUD.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDUH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than CUD.TO's 1.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.92%1.99%1.76%1.96%1.84%1.98%2.05%1.65%2.05%1.44%1.76%1.72%
XDUH.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.26%2.41%2.61%2.49%2.35%2.56%2.62%2.31%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDUH.TO and CUD.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDUH.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUH.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CUD.TO.

XDUH.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while CUD.TO tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XDUH.TO and 0.66% for CUD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUH.TO and CUD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer