XDTE vs. SPYV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. XDTE is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Over the past year, XDTE returned 21.75% vs 20.65% for SPYV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.

Performance

XDTE vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDTE achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 8.25% return.

XDTE

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYV

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: 15.13%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDTE vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	6.97%	12.60%	17.12%
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	8.25%	13.18%	7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XDTE and SPYV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.71

The correlation between XDTE and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDTE vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDTE	SPYV
Technology	35.6%	21.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	14.5%
Communication Services	11.2%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.2%
Healthcare	8.5%	11.6%
Industrials	8.3%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	9.1%
Energy	3.5%	7.1%
Utilities	2.4%	4.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	3.4%

Return for Risk

XDTE vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDTE

XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 68
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SPYV

SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 75
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDTE vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDTE	SPYV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.08	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.92	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.37	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.33	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.55	12.73	-0.18

XDTE vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDTE and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDTE vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and SPYV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDTE	SPYV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.09%	-58.45%	+39.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-6.22%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-0.18%	-2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-8.71%	+6.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.63%	+0.11%

Volatility

XDTE vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that XDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDTE	SPYV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	2.70%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	7.26%	+1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	9.97%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.92%	14.42%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.92%	16.94%	-3.02%

XDTE vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDTE vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.43%, more than SPYV's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	1.68%	1.77%	2.29%	1.75%	2.22%	2.10%	2.38%	2.25%	2.97%	2.77%	2.39%	2.53%
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	33.43%	39.16%	20.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDTE and SPYV in my portfolio?

XDTE and SPYV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDTE or SPYV?

XDTE has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

Which ETF is better, XDTE or SPYV?

On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 21.75% vs 20.65% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDTE or SPYV?

Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 21.75% return vs 20.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDTE or SPYV?

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for XDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDTE or SPYV?

XDTE has the higher dividend yield at 33.43%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.

What is the main difference between XDTE and SPYV?

XDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 0.04% for SPYV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.