XDTE vs. FBY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDTE returned 22.04% vs -17.63% for FBY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FBY.

Performance

XDTE vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDTE achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -13.50% return.

XDTE

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 22.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: -13.50%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: -17.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDTE vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	6.79%	12.60%	17.12%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-13.50%	1.98%	19.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XDTE and FBY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.56

The correlation between XDTE and FBY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDTE vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDTE

XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 61
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDTE vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDTE	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	-0.60	+2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	-0.68	+3.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.91	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	-0.60	+3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.61	-1.22	+13.84

XDTE vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDTE and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDTE vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum FBY drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDTE	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.09%	-31.53%	+12.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-29.50%	+21.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-25.66%	+23.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-8.09%	+5.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	14.46%	-12.71%

Volatility

XDTE vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) is 4.52%, while YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that XDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDTE	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	10.24%	-5.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.12%	23.30%	-14.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	29.60%	-18.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	28.65%	-14.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.97%	28.65%	-14.68%

XDTE vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDTE vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.21%, less than FBY's 57.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	57.98%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	33.21%	39.16%	20.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDTE and FBY in my portfolio?

XDTE and FBY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDTE or FBY?

FBY has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to XDTE (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, XDTE or FBY?

On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 22.04% vs -17.63% for FBY. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDTE or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 22.04% return vs -17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDTE or FBY?

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDTE or FBY?

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.98%, compared with 33.21% for XDTE.

What is the main difference between XDTE and FBY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 0.99% for FBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.