PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDSR.TO vs. GRNB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XDSR.TO) and VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDSR.TO is traded in CAD, while GRNB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRNB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSR.TO achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than GRNB's 3.35% return.


XDSR.TO

1D
0.18%
1M
0.72%
6M
10.76%
YTD
15.63%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

GRNB

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.61%
6M
1.63%
YTD
3.35%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
15.63%16.99%12.43%16.82%-14.11%10.06%23.07%
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
3.35%2.20%12.06%4.53%-6.35%-2.41%-4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSR.TO and GRNB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020

0.10

The correlation between XDSR.TO and GRNB shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSR.TO
XDSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XDSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNB
GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XDSR.TO) and VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDSR.TOGRNBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.70

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

3.65

+3.95

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the GRNB Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDSR.TO and GRNB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.62%, which is greater than GRNB's maximum drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSR.TO and GRNB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDSR.TOGRNBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.62%

-18.51%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-4.04%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.63%

-5.87%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-14.01%

-15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-1.51%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-5.71%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

1.88%

+1.20%

Volatility

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XDSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) at 1.45%. This indicates that XDSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDSR.TOGRNBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

1.45%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

3.84%

+9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

5.21%

+10.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

8.01%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

8.08%

+6.74%

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSR.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNB's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDSR.TO vs. GRNB - Dividend Comparison

XDSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than GRNB's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
4.38%4.18%3.83%3.17%2.60%1.97%2.24%1.79%1.21%1.09%
XDSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
1.70%1.83%1.94%1.94%2.27%1.45%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDSR.TO and GRNB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRNB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRNB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XDSR.TO.

XDSR.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GRNB is Global Bonds. XDSR.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while GRNB tracks S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XDSR.TO and 0.20% for GRNB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDSR.TO and GRNB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer