PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDQQ vs. DRIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than DRIP's -48.42% return.


XDQQ

1D
1.09%
1M
-1.14%
6M
0.05%
YTD
1.47%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*

DRIP

1D
-0.65%
1M
-2.28%
6M
-45.20%
YTD
-48.42%
1Y
-47.19%
3Y*
-27.53%
5Y*
-43.20%
10Y*
-42.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
1.47%13.75%31.47%30.15%-33.74%18.52%
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
-48.42%-14.81%1.27%-17.24%-73.57%-53.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and DRIP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

-0.22

The correlation between XDQQ and DRIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (5 years) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. DRIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIP
DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDQQDRIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.87

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

-0.76

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

-1.32

+6.62

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the DRIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and DRIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum DRIP drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and DRIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDQQDRIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-99.95%

+64.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-62.18%

+50.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-76.02%

+52.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-96.24%

+60.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-99.94%

+98.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-90.51%

+79.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

35.66%

-33.03%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 4.15%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDQQDRIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

16.32%

-12.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

44.01%

-33.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

56.73%

-42.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

68.02%

-48.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

95.90%

-76.37%

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIP's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDQQ vs. DRIP - Dividend Comparison

XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
3.44%2.86%4.38%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.96%0.58%
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDQQ and DRIP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIP has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to XDQQ (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs DRIP's -99.95%.

On 5-year performance, XDQQ leads with 7.30% vs -43.20% for DRIP. On fees, XDQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 7.30% return vs -43.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 1.07% for DRIP.

XDQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDQQ and DRIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer