XDQQ vs. COTG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XDQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

XDQQ vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 12.95% return.

XDQQ

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -1.63%
• 6M: -3.53%
• YTD: -1.59%
• 1Y: 10.17%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.95%

COTG

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: -8.93%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	$660.67K	$1.03M	$1.54M
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	$488.37K	$671.97K	$332.30K

XDQQ vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	-1.59%	5.13%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	12.95%	-22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and COTG is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDQQ

XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 29
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDQQ vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDQQ	COTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.44	—	—

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDQQ	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.63%	-32.16%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.45%	-26.33%	+21.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-12.04%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDQQ	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.51%	40.89%	-25.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.04%	40.89%	-20.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	40.89%	-21.27%

XDQQ vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDQQ vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDQQ nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDQQ and COTG in my portfolio?

XDQQ and COTG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDQQ or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDQQ or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDQQ or COTG?

XDQQ and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDQQ and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.75% for COTG.