XDIV vs. RSPG
XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. XDIV is actively managed, while RSPG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XDIV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.
Performance
XDIV vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 34.27% return.
XDIV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 28.95%
- 1Y
- 47.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
XDIV vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 10.63% | 9.90% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 34.27% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDIV and RSPG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | -0.03 |
XDIV vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDIV
RSPG
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XDIV
RSPG
-
Financial Services
XDIV
RSPG
Communication Services
XDIV
RSPG
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDIV
RSPG
-
Healthcare
XDIV
RSPG
-
Industrials
XDIV
RSPG
-
Consumer Defensive
XDIV
RSPG
-
Energy
XDIV
RSPG
Utilities
XDIV
RSPG
-
Real Estate
XDIV
RSPG
-
Basic Materials
XDIV
RSPG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDIV vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank
XDIV
RSPG
XDIV vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDIV | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.18 | +1.80 |
Drawdowns
XDIV vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and RSPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDIV | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -79.98% | +70.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -5.67% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -25.47% | +24.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility
XDIV vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDIV | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 21.69% | -9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 28.31% | -16.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 33.57% | -21.26% |
XDIV vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDIV vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison
XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.94% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDIV and RSPG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.
XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.40% for RSPG.
Find the right allocation for XDIV and RSPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer