PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. RSPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 34.27% return.


XDIV

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPG

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
34.27%
6M
28.95%
1Y
47.49%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
21.10%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and RSPG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

-0.03

XDIV vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
RSPG

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
0.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
100.0%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XDIV
36.2%
RSPG

-

Financial Services

XDIV
11.9%
RSPG
0.0%

Communication Services

XDIV
10.9%
RSPG

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
10.1%
RSPG

-

Healthcare

XDIV
8.4%
RSPG

-

Industrials

XDIV
8.1%
RSPG

-

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.9%
RSPG

-

Energy

XDIV
3.5%
RSPG
100.0%

Utilities

XDIV
2.3%
RSPG

-

Real Estate

XDIV
1.9%
RSPG

-

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.8%
RSPG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVRSPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

0.18

+1.80

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and RSPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVRSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-79.98%

+70.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-5.67%

+5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-25.47%

+24.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

Volatility

XDIV vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVRSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

21.69%

-9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.31%

28.31%

-16.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

33.57%

-21.26%

XDIV vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
1.94%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and RSPG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.40% for RSPG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and RSPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer