PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. MAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -7.53% return.


XDIV

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGY

1D
-1.25%
1M
-7.24%
YTD
-7.53%
6M
-8.15%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and MAGY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.77

XDIV vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
MAGY

Technology

39.0%

-

Financial Services

11.1%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

XDIV
39.0%
MAGY

-

Financial Services

XDIV
11.1%
MAGY
100.0%

Communication Services

XDIV
10.6%
MAGY

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
9.9%
MAGY

-

Healthcare

XDIV
8.3%
MAGY

-

Industrials

XDIV
7.8%
MAGY

-

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.5%
MAGY

-

Energy

XDIV
3.1%
MAGY

-

Utilities

XDIV
2.1%
MAGY

-

Real Estate

XDIV
1.8%
MAGY

-

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.7%
MAGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVMAGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

XDIV vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum MAGY drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and MAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVMAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-14.29%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-9.54%

+6.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-2.88%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

Volatility

XDIV vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVMAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

15.38%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

15.45%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

15.45%

-2.59%

XDIV vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and MAGY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 40.01%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while MAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.99% for MAGY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and MAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer