PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 18.30% return.


XDIV

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIQ

1D
-0.19%
1M
8.51%
YTD
18.30%
6M
17.64%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and GPIQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.93

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
GPIQ

Technology

36.2%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.2%

Industrials

8.1%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

XDIV
36.2%
GPIQ
53.8%

Financial Services

XDIV
11.9%
GPIQ
0.2%

Communication Services

XDIV
10.9%
GPIQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
10.1%
GPIQ
12.3%

Healthcare

XDIV
8.4%
GPIQ
4.2%

Industrials

XDIV
8.1%
GPIQ
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.9%
GPIQ
7.7%

Energy

XDIV
3.5%
GPIQ
0.6%

Utilities

XDIV
2.3%
GPIQ
1.4%

Real Estate

XDIV
1.9%
GPIQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.8%
GPIQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVGPIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

1.78

+0.20

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and GPIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-21.06%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.19%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-2.27%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

Volatility

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

13.40%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.31%

17.47%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

17.47%

-5.16%

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.32%9.81%9.18%1.74%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XDIV and GPIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and GPIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer