PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDIV.TO vs. HAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDIV.TO vs. HAP

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index, while HAP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDIV.TO returned 17.21%/yr vs 14.48%/yr for HAP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDIV.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.

Performance

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDIV.TO is traded in CAD, while HAP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HAP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDIV.TO having a 21.85% return and HAP slightly lower at 20.84%.

XDIV.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
4.53%
YTD
21.85%
6M
20.22%
1Y
40.47%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
—

HAP

1D
1.39%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
20.84%
6M
20.95%
1Y
42.22%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		21.85%25.04%19.84%11.95%0.49%33.31%-7.53%25.14%-9.81%8.00%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF		20.84%28.75%4.04%0.03%14.67%24.98%3.77%13.71%-3.17%6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XDIV.TO and HAP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.58

The correlation between XDIV.TO and HAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDIV.TO
HAP

Financial Services

46.7%

-

Energy

28.8%
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
0.2%

Utilities

11.3%
9.3%

Technology

1.3%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

38.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Healthcare

-

2.8%

Industrials

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Financial Services

XDIV.TO
46.7%
HAP

-

Energy

XDIV.TO
28.8%
HAP
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV.TO
11.5%
HAP
0.2%

Utilities

XDIV.TO
11.3%
HAP
9.3%

Technology

XDIV.TO
1.3%
HAP
1.4%

Communication Services

XDIV.TO
0.4%
HAP

-

Basic Materials

XDIV.TO

-

HAP
38.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV.TO

-

HAP
6.4%

Healthcare

XDIV.TO

-

HAP
2.8%

Industrials

XDIV.TO

-

HAP
10.1%

Real Estate

XDIV.TO

-

HAP
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

Often compared with XDIV.TO:
XDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDIV.TO vs. XDV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDIV.TO vs. CDZ.TO
Often compared with HAP:
HAP vs. GUNRHAP vs. NANRHAP vs. URAHAP vs. QQQHAP vs. DGROHAP vs. SPYHAP vs. XLKQ.L

Return for Risk

XDIV.TO vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDIV.TOHAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.14
2.68

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
7.59
3.47

+4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.07

1.47

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.55

5.41

+12.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

59.35

20.72

+38.63

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.14, which is higher than the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV.TO and HAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, roughly equal to the maximum HAP drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV.TO and HAP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDIV.TOHAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-40.28%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-7.85%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-14.67%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-22.99%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.93%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.79%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-7.79%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

2.05%

-1.36%

Volatility

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) is 2.47%, while VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that XDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDIV.TOHAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

5.41%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

13.25%

-6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.95%

15.87%

-7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

19.12%

-8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

20.59%

-4.26%

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDIV.TO vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than HAP's 1.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF		1.91%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		3.25%3.90%4.50%4.42%4.15%3.76%4.85%4.24%5.13%1.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDIV.TO and HAP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.

XDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while HAP is Energy Equities. XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for XDIV.TO and 0.42% for HAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV.TO and HAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer