XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE
XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) and SC0T.DE (Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select while SC0T.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG3.DE returned 1.94%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for SC0T.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG3.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SC0T.DE.
Performance
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG3.DE achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than SC0T.DE's -3.57% return.
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.54%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SC0T.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -2.50%
- 1Y
- 2.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
SC0T.DE Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | -3.57% | 8.45% | 6.96% | 3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG3.DE and SC0T.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XDG3.DE and SC0T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDG3.DE
SC0T.DE
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG3.DE | SC0T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.05 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.24 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG3.DE | SC0T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.20 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.63 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG3.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum SC0T.DE drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG3.DE and SC0T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG3.DE | SC0T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.49% | -26.52% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -12.87% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -21.67% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -9.59% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -6.03% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 5.58% | -0.29% |
Volatility
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) is 4.95%, while Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that XDG3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG3.DE | SC0T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 5.31% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 11.43% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 15.98% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 14.84% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 15.39% | -2.08% |
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG3.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0T.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDG3.DE vs. SC0T.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDG3.DE nor SC0T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG3.DE and SC0T.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SC0T.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0T.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while SC0T.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG3.DE and 0.20% for SC0T.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDG3.DE and SC0T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer