XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) and EHLT.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select while EHLT.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG3.DE returned 1.94%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for EHLT.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG3.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EHLT.DE.

Performance

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG3.DE achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than EHLT.DE's -2.49% return.

XDG3.DE

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: -6.02%
• 6M: -6.54%
• 1Y: 2.67%
• 3Y*: 1.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EHLT.DE

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: -2.49%
• 6M: -0.99%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 1.80%
• 5Y*: 4.71%
• 10Y*: 5.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C	-6.02%	1.47%	9.58%	2.52%
EHLT.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist	-2.49%	7.09%	4.20%	4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.68

The correlation between XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG3.DE

XDG3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XDG3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

EHLT.DE

EHLT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
EHLT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
EHLT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
EHLT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EHLT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
EHLT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDG3.DE	EHLT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.30	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	0.56	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.07	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	0.40	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.44	0.89	-0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the EHLT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDG3.DE	EHLT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.30	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.56	-0.40

Drawdowns

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG3.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum EHLT.DE drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDG3.DE	EHLT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.49%	-26.14%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.31%	-12.46%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.49%	-26.14%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.91%	-11.58%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.57%	-6.90%	+1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	5.62%	-0.33%

Volatility

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) is 4.95%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that XDG3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHLT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDG3.DE	EHLT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	5.56%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	11.62%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	16.76%	-2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.31%	16.55%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.31%	16.19%	-2.88%

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG3.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EHLT.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDG3.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDG3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EHLT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EHLT.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist	1.33%	1.30%	1.78%	0.00%	2.28%	1.89%	2.32%	1.88%	2.32%	0.49%
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE in my portfolio?

XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDG3.DE or EHLT.DE?

On fees, EHLT.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDG3.DE or EHLT.DE?

EHLT.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.

What is the main difference between XDG3.DE and EHLT.DE?

XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while EHLT.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG3.DE and 0.30% for EHLT.DE.