SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE).

SC0T.DE and CBUF.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SC0T.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Health Care. It was launched on Jul 8, 2009. CBUF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. It was launched on Oct 17, 2019. Both SC0T.DE and CBUF.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SC0T.DE Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF	-1.91%	8.45%	6.96%	5.35%	-7.56%	25.20%	-1.18%	9.98%
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist	-3.16%	2.56%	0.75%	0.33%	2.09%	30.42%	2.79%	11.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0T.DE achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly higher than CBUF.DE's -3.16% return.

SC0T.DE

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -1.91%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 6.61%

CBUF.DE

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -3.75%
• YTD: -3.16%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: -0.06%
• 3Y*: 1.12%
• 5Y*: 4.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0T.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SC0T.DE

Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF

CBUF.DE

iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist

Return for Risk

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0T.DE

SC0T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 18
SC0T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SC0T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SC0T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SC0T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SC0T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

CBUF.DE

CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 12
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SC0T.DE	CBUF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	-0.00	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	0.11	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.01	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	0.15	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.41	0.35	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0T.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0T.DE and CBUF.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SC0T.DE	CBUF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	-0.00	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.35	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.44	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between SC0T.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC0T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SC0T.DE Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.09%	1.06%	1.02%	1.16%	1.09%	1.05%	1.27%	0.10%

Drawdowns

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0T.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CBUF.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0T.DE and CBUF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SC0T.DE	CBUF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.52%	-25.94%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.87%	-11.34%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.67%	-21.76%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.03%	-10.54%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-5.49%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	3.93%	+0.19%

Volatility

SC0T.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) at 4.17%. This indicates that SC0T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SC0T.DE	CBUF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	4.17%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	8.63%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.40%	16.57%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	13.45%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	15.33%	+0.02%