SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE).
SC0T.DE and QDVG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SC0T.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Health Care. It was launched on Jul 8, 2009. QDVG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both SC0T.DE and QDVG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC0T.DE Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | -2.16% | 8.45% | 6.96% | 5.35% | -7.56% | 25.20% | -1.18% | 32.22% | -1.43% | 4.65% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -3.36% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SC0T.DE achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than QDVG.DE's -3.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0T.DE has underperformed QDVG.DE with an annualized return of 6.79%, while QDVG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.18% annualized return.
SC0T.DE
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 2.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 5.23%
- 1Y
- -2.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0T.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SC0T.DE
QDVG.DE
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SC0T.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | -0.13 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | -0.06 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.99 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | -0.05 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | -0.10 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SC0T.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | -0.13 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.48 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0T.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0T.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0T.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.52%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVG.DE drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0T.DE and QDVG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SC0T.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.52% | -26.77% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.87% | -15.07% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.67% | -22.70% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.52% | -26.77% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.27% | -9.50% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -5.26% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 5.78% | -1.45% |
Volatility
SC0T.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco European Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (SC0T.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) at 4.07%. This indicates that SC0T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SC0T.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 4.07% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 9.32% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 17.58% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 14.34% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 15.78% | -0.43% |