PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEW.DE achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than XCMC.DE's 26.46% return.


XDEW.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.32%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.04%

XCMC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.32%
6M
13.97%
YTD
26.46%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.50%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%3.52%
XCMC.DE
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C
26.46%-2.66%11.92%-9.34%24.84%-10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEW.DE and XCMC.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021

0.17

The correlation between XDEW.DE and XCMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XCMC.DE
XCMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEW.DEXCMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

2.73

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

8.23

+3.82

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEW.DE and XCMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than XCMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEW.DE and XCMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEW.DEXCMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-22.91%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-9.66%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-14.82%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-4.96%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-12.53%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

3.20%

-1.55%

Volatility

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) is 2.81%, while Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that XDEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEW.DEXCMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.68%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

12.86%

-6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

17.52%

-7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

17.29%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

17.29%

-0.49%

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XCMC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEW.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEW.DE nor XCMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEW.DE and XCMC.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

XDEW.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while XCMC.DE is Commodities. XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDEW.DE and 0.19% for XCMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEW.DE and XCMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer