XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE).
XCMC.DE and M9SA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCMC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Nov 3, 2021. M9SA.DE is a passively managed fund by China Post Global that tracks the performance of the Rogers International Commodity (RICI). It was launched on May 8, 2006. Both XCMC.DE and M9SA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 23.76% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
M9SA.DE Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF | 27.52% | -4.38% | 10.96% | -8.16% | 23.00% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCMC.DE achieves a 23.76% return, which is significantly lower than M9SA.DE's 27.52% return.
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 23.76%
- 6M
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- 14.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M9SA.DE
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 13.95%
- YTD
- 27.52%
- 6M
- 32.94%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than M9SA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCMC.DE
M9SA.DE
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCMC.DE | M9SA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.93 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.31 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.30 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 4.11 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCMC.DE | M9SA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.93 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.06 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCMC.DE and M9SA.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCMC.DE nor M9SA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum M9SA.DE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and M9SA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCMC.DE | M9SA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -68.53% | +45.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.15% | -12.51% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -2.85% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -33.95% | +20.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 5.02% | -1.25% |
Volatility
XCMC.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) is 6.26%, while Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE) has a volatility of 12.67%. This indicates that XCMC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than M9SA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCMC.DE | M9SA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 12.67% | -6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 16.77% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 21.14% | -3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 18.84% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 17.94% | -0.60% |