XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L).
XDEW.DE and IFFF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDEW.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Equal Weight. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. IFFF.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Oct 28, 2005. Both XDEW.DE and IFFF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDEW.DE or IFFF.L.
Key characteristics
| XDEW.DE | IFFF.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.01% | 4.17% |
| 1Y Return | 17.10% | 3.53% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.23% | -4.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.41% | 0.24% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.80% | 4.52% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.73 | 0.28 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.04% | 15.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.79% | -53.09% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -28.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEW.DE and IFFF.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDEW.DE achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than IFFF.L's 4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEW.DE has outperformed IFFF.L with an annualized return of 11.80%, while IFFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IFFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L - Dividend Comparison
XDEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IFFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEW.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.88% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.54% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum IFFF.L drawdown of -53.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEW.DE and IFFF.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDEW.DE vs. IFFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) is 3.48%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that XDEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.