PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCMC.DE vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCMC.DE is traded in EUR, while COPX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XCMC.DE having a 28.51% return and COPX slightly lower at 27.10%.


XCMC.DE

1D
-1.20%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
28.51%
6M
19.96%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
10Y*

COPX

1D
-0.17%
1M
16.13%
YTD
27.10%
6M
37.77%
1Y
114.34%
3Y*
34.31%
5Y*
20.98%
10Y*
21.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCMC.DE
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C
28.51%-2.66%11.92%-9.34%24.84%-11.32%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
27.10%70.54%10.40%5.13%5.39%4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XCMC.DE and COPX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.27

The correlation between XCMC.DE and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCMC.DE vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCMC.DE
XCMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCMC.DECOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

4.38

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

14.44

-6.00

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCMC.DE and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCMC.DECOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.91

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.23

+0.21

Drawdowns

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -79.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCMC.DECOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-79.16%

+56.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-26.24%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-40.25%

+25.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-4.03%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-34.99%

+22.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

7.95%

-4.50%

Volatility

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) is 4.94%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 14.58%. This indicates that XCMC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCMC.DECOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

14.58%

-9.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

33.74%

-18.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

39.47%

-21.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

34.11%

-16.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

33.96%

-16.63%

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCMC.DE vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

XCMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.13%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
XCMC.DE
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCMC.DE and COPX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

XCMC.DE is categorized as Commodities, while COPX is Materials. XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCMC.DE and 0.65% for COPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCMC.DE and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer