XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L
XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.L returned 13.44%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.L achieves a 34.49% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.L has underperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 13.44%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.
XDEV.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 34.49%
- 6M
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- 67.77%
- 3Y*
- 26.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 34.49% | 30.51% | 6.79% | 13.25% | 1.01% | 21.67% | -6.88% | 14.56% | -9.23% | 11.91% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.L and SSLN.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.L
SSLN.L
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEV.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.97 | 1.37 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.75 | 2.98 | +6.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.53 | 6.53 | +31.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEV.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.07 | 2.11 | +2.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | 0.70 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.57 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.17 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.L drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -69.95% | +41.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.92% | -38.72% | +31.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.00% | -38.72% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | -38.72% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.20% | -38.72% | +10.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -33.62% | +32.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -45.32% | +40.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 17.69% | -15.89% |
Volatility
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) is 5.42%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that XDEV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 16.31% | -10.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 51.81% | -40.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 54.53% | -41.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 33.31% | -20.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 29.69% | -14.65% |
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEV.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.L.
XDEV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer