PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDER.L vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDER.L vs. URTH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDER.L (Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C) and URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDER.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while URTH is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDER.L returned 0.79%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for URTH. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDER.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for URTH.

Performance

XDER.L vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDER.L is traded in GBp, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDER.L achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XDER.L has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 0.79%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.

XDER.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
-4.50%
10Y*
0.79%

URTH

1D
0.50%
1M
5.34%
YTD
11.16%
6M
10.55%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDER.L vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDER.L
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C		-1.79%11.17%-7.99%13.38%-32.92%10.39%-5.98%22.10%-7.09%16.56%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF		11.16%12.71%20.73%17.75%-8.21%23.43%12.38%23.27%-3.14%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XDER.L and URTH is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012

0.32

The correlation between XDER.L and URTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDER.L vs. URTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDER.L
URTH

Real Estate

97.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
9.3%

Financial Services

0.5%
15.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.2%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Industrials

-

11.3%

Technology

-

28.3%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Real Estate

XDER.L
97.7%
URTH
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDER.L
1.0%
URTH
9.3%

Financial Services

XDER.L
0.5%
URTH
15.8%

Basic Materials

XDER.L

-

URTH
3.3%

Communication Services

XDER.L

-

URTH
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

XDER.L

-

URTH
5.2%

Energy

XDER.L

-

URTH
4.2%

Healthcare

XDER.L

-

URTH
8.8%

Industrials

XDER.L

-

URTH
11.3%

Technology

XDER.L

-

URTH
28.3%

Utilities

XDER.L

-

URTH
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C

iShares MSCI World ETF

Often compared with XDER.L:
XDER.L vs. VNQXDER.L vs. IPRP.LXDER.L vs. VGSIXXDER.L vs. IDWP.LXDER.L vs. AREG.LXDER.L vs. IWDP.LXDER.L vs. HPRD.L
Often compared with URTH:
URTH vs. VTURTH vs. IWDA.LURTH vs. SPYURTH vs. VOOURTH vs. XWD.TOURTH vs. BRK-BURTH vs. VXUS

Return for Risk

XDER.L vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDER.L
XDER.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDER.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDER.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDER.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XDER.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDER.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDER.L vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDER.LURTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.02
2.53

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.08
3.32

-3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.47

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

4.01

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

16.61

-16.66

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDER.L vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDER.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDER.L and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDER.LURTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

2.53

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.92

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.85

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.80

-0.49

Drawdowns

XDER.L vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDER.L drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -27.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDER.L and URTH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDER.LURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.20%

-27.18%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.58%

-6.95%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-18.55%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.20%

-18.55%

-26.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

-27.18%

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.03%

0.00%

-27.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-3.33%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

1.68%

+4.58%

Volatility

XDER.L vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 2.73%. This indicates that XDER.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDER.LURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

2.73%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

8.14%

+5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

11.00%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

14.41%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

16.68%

+2.09%

XDER.L vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDER.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDER.L vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

XDER.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF		1.34%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%
XDER.L
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDER.L and URTH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, URTH is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

URTH is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XDER.L.

XDER.L is categorized as REIT, while URTH is Global Equities. XDER.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XDER.L and 0.24% for URTH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDER.L and URTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer