XDER.L vs. IPRP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L).
XDER.L and IPRP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDER.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. It was launched on Mar 25, 2010. IPRP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. It was launched on Nov 4, 2005. Both XDER.L and IPRP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDER.L or IPRP.L.
Key characteristics
| XDER.L | IPRP.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.45% | 5.98% |
| 1Y Return | 25.38% | 26.98% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.88% | -6.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.35% | -3.32% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.54% | 4.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.07 | 1.18 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.90% | 20.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.20% | -59.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.13% | -24.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDER.L and IPRP.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDER.L vs. IPRP.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDER.L achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than IPRP.L's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XDER.L has underperformed IPRP.L with an annualized return of 3.54%, while IPRP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDER.L vs. IPRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDER.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than IPRP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDER.L vs. IPRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDER.L vs. IPRP.L - Dividend Comparison
XDER.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDER.L Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.05% | 4.90% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.46% | 3.70% | 3.20% | 3.07% | 3.60% | 3.78% | 3.62% |
Drawdowns
XDER.L vs. IPRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDER.L drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, smaller than the maximum IPRP.L drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDER.L and IPRP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDER.L vs. IPRP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.