PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDER.L vs. AREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDER.L achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than AREG.L's 2.37% return.


XDER.L

1D
2.63%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
-2.59%
10Y*
0.98%

AREG.L

1D
0.86%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
2.37%
6M
1.71%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDER.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than AREG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDER.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDER.L
XDER.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XDER.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDER.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDER.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XDER.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDER.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AREG.L
AREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDER.LAREG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

0.32

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

0.52

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.07

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

0.49

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.98

1.65

+0.33

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDER.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the AREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDER.L and AREG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDER.LAREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.32

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.30

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between XDER.L and AREG.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDER.L nor AREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDER.L drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than AREG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDER.L and AREG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDER.LAREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.20%

-18.47%

-26.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.58%

-9.99%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.11%

-7.41%

-19.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-5.74%

-7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

2.81%

+1.83%

Volatility

XDER.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) at 4.67%. This indicates that XDER.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDER.LAREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

4.67%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

8.60%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

13.56%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

12.41%

+8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

12.41%

+6.27%