XDER.L vs. EXUS.L
XDER.L (Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C) and EXUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XDER.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while EXUS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XDER.L returned -0.33% vs 23.39% for EXUS.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDER.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EXUS.L.
Performance
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDER.L is traded in GBp, while EXUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EXUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDER.L achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.L's 9.41% return.
XDER.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- -0.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- -4.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.79%
EXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 23.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XDER.L Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C | -1.79% | 11.17% | 3.40% |
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 9.41% | 22.57% | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDER.L and EXUS.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.42 |
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDER.L
EXUS.L
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
XDER.L
EXUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDER.L
EXUS.L
Financial Services
XDER.L
EXUS.L
Basic Materials
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Communication Services
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Consumer Defensive
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Energy
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Healthcare
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Industrials
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Technology
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Utilities
XDER.L
-
EXUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDER.L
EXUS.L
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDER.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.34 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.39 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 8.85 | -8.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDER.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 1.76 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.14 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDER.L drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than EXUS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDER.L and EXUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDER.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -12.97% | -32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.58% | -9.70% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.03% | -0.12% | -26.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -1.76% | -11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 2.63% | +3.63% |
Volatility
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) at 3.75%. This indicates that XDER.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDER.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 3.75% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 11.22% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 13.17% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 13.53% | +7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 13.53% | +5.24% |
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDER.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDER.L vs. EXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDER.L nor EXUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDER.L and EXUS.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XDER.L.
XDER.L is categorized as REIT, while EXUS.L is Global Equities. XDER.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while EXUS.L tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XDER.L and 0.15% for EXUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDER.L and EXUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer